We are indeed shooting at the higher frame rate. The key thing to understand is that this process requires both shooting and projecting at 48 fps, rather than the usual 24 fps (films have been shot at 24 frames per second since the late 1920’s). So the result looks like normal speed, but…
Hmmm, interesting. I’ll have to see it to not think it looks cheesy. I still like my 24p “film look”
Bring it on I say. Don’t kill film but let this new stuff happen…eventually it will be the new old?
-
mangalcun liked this
-
academyclass2011 reblogged this from justin
-
editorsplayground liked this
-
jpegmasterjesse reblogged this from thedailyprofile and added:
Good news to me. The fellowship had far too many “Slow-mo” sequences that are just plain painful.
-
thedailyprofile reblogged this from justin and added:
Bring it on I say. Don’t kill film but let this new stuff happen…eventually it will be the new old?
-
namelessted reblogged this from justin and added:
I think that as long as they are filming at the 48 frames per second it should look good. The thing I absolutely despise...
-
mikekarnell liked this
-
humancamcorder liked this
-
grahamgrafx liked this
-
emmyaward liked this
-
theswankycommuter liked this
-
vidvisionify liked this
-
le0x reblogged this from justin and added:
OH! bueno vamos a ver que tal
-
justin reblogged this from millertime83 and added:
Hmmm, interesting. I’ll have...see it to not think it looks cheesy. I still like my 24p...
-
justin liked this
-
kevinmosley said:
I’m listening. 3D is crap. This sounds very interesting.
-
millertime83 posted this
